Reg. (EU) 2023/988 · Art. 9 Generate Technical File — €49

EU Authorised Representative for Indian manufacturers: the piece upstream that nobody is selling you with the AR contract is the Article 9 technical file, and that’s what GPSRCheck generates

If you are reading this page you have probably already spent a few hours reviewing the EU Authorised Representative (EU AR, also called EU Responsible Person under Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2023/988) market for Indian manufacturers. You have seen ecinternational.co.in based in India, Veteran Group and CMS MedTech focused historically on medical device manufacturers, I3CGlobal and Advena serving broader product categories, and European providers such as EaseCert, Euverify, Lovat Compliance and gpsrcompliant.eu offering the AR service from within the EU directly. What none of these AR providers produce for you is the Article 9 technical file that your European buyer is asking for. That file is the manufacturer’s own obligation under the Regulation, and without it the AR has nothing to hand over when a market surveillance authority asks. GPSRCheck generates the Article 9 file in ten minutes per SKU for €49, designed to pair with any EU AR service you choose. One license per SKU, permanent PDF, 30-day edit window with up to 10 regenerations.

Generate GPSR Technical File Free diagnostic: does your product need GPSR documentation?

€49 per SKU · 10 minutes · 6-page PDF: technical file + EU Declaration of Conformity + printable label · 100% in your browser · Permanent PDF · 30-day edit window, up to 10 regenerations

25 styles in your SS26 order? 80 SKUs in your seasonal catalogue? One file at a time is not a plan.

Need GPSR technical files at volume? For high-volume seasonal catalogues and special pricing, visit solidwaretools.com or email hello@solidwaretools.com.

Commercial enquiries
One-business-day response · Direct quote by email · No sales call · No subscription · Payment via Gumroad accepts INR cards with international enablement
Built on Regulation (EU) 2023/988·Article 9 internal risk analysis·EU Declaration of Conformity included·Printable product label·Data never leaves your browser

What the EU Authorised Representative does, and what they structurally cannot do for you

The EU Authorised Representative under Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2023/988 is a natural or legal person established in the European Union who the manufacturer designates in writing as the contact point for market surveillance authorities. Their core obligations include maintaining the EU Declaration of Conformity available for the duration required by the Regulation, making the technical file available to authorities on request, cooperating with authorities on corrective actions, informing the manufacturer when safety issues are identified, and in some cases intervening in product withdrawals or recalls.

The key phrase in that list is “making the technical file available” — the AR’s role is to hold the file and hand it over when asked, not to produce it. The file has to exist before the AR can do their job. A Responsible Person without a file is a contact box with nothing to hand over, and that is a failure mode both the Responsible Person service and the manufacturer want to avoid. This is structurally important for the price architecture of the compliance package: most EU AR providers price their service on an annual basis (€150–500 per year typical) and the service scope is defined around what the AR can legally deliver: registration, holding documents, fielding authority correspondence, coordinating recalls. What the AR cannot deliver is the underlying risk analysis of your product, because the evidence and the process knowledge that feed the risk analysis live at your manufacturing unit in India. GPSRCheck fills exactly that gap at €49 per SKU one-time.

Choosing an EU Authorised Representative for an Indian manufacturer — what to look for, what each tier offers

Tier 1 — India-based consultancies acting as EU AR intermediaries

ecinternational.co.in, Veteran Group India and similar

Operate with an EU legal partner and serve as the entry-level AR service for Indian manufacturers. Accessible in Indian Standard Time and in local languages. Historically many specialised in medical devices (MDR/IVDR) and are extending to GPSR. Price points and bundling vary; request a quote.

Tier 2 — EU-based providers specialised in specific verticals

Advena, I3CGlobal, CMS MedTech and similar

Operate from the EU with specialist expertise in specific regulatory frameworks. Typically price range €300–800 per year depending on complexity. Historically medical device-focused, extending to GPSR.

Tier 3 — EU-based generalist AR providers for e-commerce and small B2B

EaseCert, Euverify, Lovat Compliance, EU Compliance Partner, gpsrcompliant.eu

Target primarily non-EU e-commerce sellers on Amazon, Shopify and Etsy but also serve B2B exporters looking for a standalone AR service. Price range €150–800 per year for standalone AR or €400–500 one-time for GPSR+AR bundles. The structural fit for most Indian textile, leather and handicraft exporters who need a separate AR at all.

Tier 4 — Enterprise consultancies with AR as part of broader offering

UL Solutions, TÜV, Bureau Veritas, SGS, Intertek

The correct choice for Indian manufacturers with very large portfolios, complex products under multiple harmonisation frameworks, or specific testing needs that the consultancy can bundle. Price points are enterprise level (€2,000–10,000+ per engagement).

The combined compliance stack: GPSRCheck + an external EU AR, total cost for a 20-SKU catalogue

ScenarioGPSRCheck filesEU AR costYear 1 totalYear 2+
B2B to importer-of-record buyer (no separate AR needed)20 × €49 = €980€0 (buyer is AR)€980€0
B2C direct (own Shopify, Amazon EU, Etsy) — separate AR required20 × €49 = €980€150–500/year€1,130–1,480€150–500/year
Bundled provider (EaseCert, €400/product, AR included)20 × €400 = €8,000€8,000€0

The difference (€8,000 vs €1,130–1,480) reflects the unbundling choice: GPSRCheck charges for the file only, the external AR charges for the AR only, and together they cost a fraction of a provider that bundles both into a single per-product fee. The quality of the underlying Article 9 file is the same — it is the same regulation, the same risk analysis structure, the same documentary output. What differs is structural pricing, not substance.

What the 6-page PDF actually contains, for an Indian exporter serving European buyers

1

Product identification and economic operator data

The style number, SKU identifier or tech pack reference your buyer uses in the PO, the brand name under which the product is placed on the EU market, your manufacturing unit as manufacturer of record with full postal address, and the slot for the EU Responsible Person contact — which may be the European importer acting as importer of record, or a dedicated EU Responsible Person provider.

2

Product description and intended use

Full composition inventory (fibre blend or leather type with tanning method, lining, trims, hardware, dyes, prints, finishes), intended use and target consumer, declared age range if relevant, conditions of use and care instructions.

3–4

Internal risk analysis under Article 9

Hazard identification across the categories relevant to non-harmonised consumer products (chemical composition under REACH for textiles and leather, azo dyes, nickel release on metal trims, chromium VI for leather, mechanical hazards, flammability for textile categories, choking and strangulation risks where drawstrings or cords are involved), severity-by-likelihood matrix per hazard, mitigation measures, residual risk statement.

5

EU Declaration of Conformity

Referencing Regulation (EU) 2023/988 Article 9 and ready for electronic signature by the manufacturer or authorised signatory. This is the document your European buyer’s legal team needs to close the compliance file and issue the PO.

6

Printable product label — two copies per A4 sheet

Manufacturer name and postal address, EU Responsible Person contact, product identifier, warnings where applicable, traceability batch code. Ready to be printed at your facility and attached to the hang tag, sewn into a care label, or affixed to the master carton.

The specific document your European buyer is asking about

When a European buyer’s legal counsel asks for “GPSR documentation” they are asking for a structured internal risk analysis under Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2023/988, the EU Declaration of Conformity that references it, and confirmation of a designated EU Responsible Person under Article 16. The internal risk analysis is the substance of the file — not a test report from an accredited laboratory, not an OEKO-TEX certificate, not a BSCI audit summary, not a certificate of origin, not an ISO 9001 statement. These adjacent documents may already be in your buyer’s tech pack and they do not replace the Article 9 file.

Under Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2023/988, for products covered by Union harmonisation legislation (LVD, EMC, RED, Cosmetics Regulation, Toy Safety Directive, Medical Device Regulation, Machinery Regulation and similar sector-specific acts) the GPSR Chapter II does not apply to the risks covered by that harmonisation legislation — but for non-harmonised consumer products such as textiles, leather goods, bags, footwear (non-PPE), fashion accessories, home decoration, ceramics, wooden furniture, stationery and most handicrafts, the Article 9 file is the primary compliance document the buyer’s legal team is asking for. GPSRCheck generates it.

What it does not generate — and what no compliance tool on the market generates legitimately — is a “GPSR certification”, because the regulation does not establish a certification scheme. Any vendor selling you a “GPSR certificate” is using terminology that does not match the text of the Regulation. What exists is the technical file, the declaration and the Responsible Person designation. That is the package your buyer needs.

Technical file and EU Responsible Person are two separate compliance layers — and many Indian exporters already have the second one resolved through their European buyer

Regulation (EU) 2023/988 imposes two distinct documentary obligations on a non-EU manufacturer placing consumer products on the EU market.

● Layer 1 — Article 9 (GPSRCheck generates this)

The technical file

The risk analysis, the EU Declaration of Conformity and the printable label — the manufacturer’s own responsibility to produce and keep for ten years after the last unit is placed on the market (Article 9.4). GPSRCheck produces this in ten minutes at €49 per SKU.

∅ Layer 2 — Article 16 (often already resolved)

The EU Responsible Person

A natural or legal person established in the EU who acts as the contact point for market surveillance authorities. For Indian exporters selling B2B to a European buyer who is the importer of record, the buyer is already the Responsible Person by operation of law — no separate contract needed. For direct B2C export (Amazon EU, own Shopify, Etsy), a separate AR provider is needed: ecinternational.co.in, Veteran Group, EaseCert, Euverify, gpsrcompliant.eu at €150–500 per year.

GPSRCheck deliberately does not bundle the Responsible Person service into its €49 fee, because many Indian exporters in B2B structures do not need a separate Responsible Person at all. Unbundling keeps the price at €49, keeps the tool focused on the one document only the manufacturer can produce, and lets you choose whatever Responsible Person arrangement fits the commercial structure of each buyer relationship.

Enforcement reality for Indian exporters shipping consumer products to Europe

📅
1 April 2024 — Amazon begins enforcement

Amazon started suspending EU listings of non-EU sellers without a designated EU Responsible Person eight months before the GPSR’s official entry into force. Non-Amazon channels followed through 2025: European B2B buyers updated their PO templates to require the Article 9 technical file as a condition of PO issuance.

⚖️
13 December 2024 — Regulation (EU) 2023/988 enters into force

The regulation entered into force across all 27 EU Member States and the EEA. EU customs at Rotterdam, Hamburg, Antwerp, Valencia, Piraeus and Gdańsk intensified documentation checks on non-EU consignments of consumer products.

Ten working days to produce the file on request

Market surveillance authorities have the power to require the technical file within a short deadline of typically ten working days. Failure to produce the file can result in withdrawal of the product from the market and inclusion in the Safety Gate public database.

⚖️
No small-business exemption

The European Commission’s official FAQ on the GPSR, published in December 2024, is explicit that exceptions cannot be made on the basis of business size. An Indian exporter with a manufacturing unit of thirty workers carries the same documentary obligations as a large manufacturing group.

📦
The commercial enforcement pathway: suspended from vendor list

For Indian exporters with B2B buyer relationships, the most common enforcement pathway is commercial, not regulatory: the European buyer’s legal department adds the Article 9 file to the supplier qualification process. Suppliers who produce the file continue receiving POs. Suppliers who cannot get suspended from the vendor list and replaced. The €49 file restores the relationship; the alternative is permanent displacement.

Consultancy, subscription platforms, bundled enterprise services and GPSRCheck

 Traditional consultancyAnnual subscription platformsBundled enterprise (EaseCert)GPSRCheck
Indicative price€400–2,000 per product€199–500 per year€400–500 one-time per product€49 per SKU, one-time
Payment modelInvoiced per engagementAnnual subscriptionOne payment per productOne payment per SKU, pay with card
EU Responsible PersonNoYes, bundledYes, bundledNo — contract separately, choose freely
Time to deliver1–3 weeks24–48 h after onboarding3–5 business days10 minutes
Data handlingUploaded to consultantCloud storage on vendor serversCloud storage on vendor servers100% browser-side
Per-SKU cost at 20 SKUs€8,000–€40,000€199–500 + per-SKU surcharges€8,000–€10,000€980 (20 × €49)

Prices for competitor services verified from their public pricing pages as of April 2026. For high-volume catalogues and special pricing, visit solidwaretools.com or email hello@solidwaretools.com.

High-volume seasonal catalogues and special pricing

For seasonal catalogues and commercial enquiries, visit solidwaretools.com or email hello@solidwaretools.com.

Commercial enquiries
One-business-day response · Direct quote by email · No sales call · Payment via Gumroad accepts INR cards with international enablement

Frequently asked questions

Can a single EU Authorised Representative serve multiple Indian manufacturers, or do we each need our own dedicated AR?
A single EU AR can represent multiple manufacturers, and most Tier 3 providers (EaseCert, Euverify, EU Compliance Partner, gpsrcompliant.eu) operate exactly that way — they serve hundreds or thousands of non-EU manufacturers in parallel under one corporate entity. The designation agreement is between you as the manufacturer and the AR service company as the legal entity, and the AR service company allocates resources internally to handle your correspondence and your file. This is why the per-manufacturer price is €150–500 per year rather than the cost of a dedicated employee.
Our medical device-specialised AR (Veteran Group, CMS MedTech, I3CGlobal) wants to also serve us as the GPSR AR. Is that fine?
Yes, technically. The legal designation under Article 16 of the GPSR is independent of the MDR designation, so the same company can act as your AR under both regimes if they offer the service. What you should verify is whether the provider has built actual GPSR-specific process capability, or whether they are extending their MDR infrastructure to GPSR without deep understanding of the Article 9 risk analysis framework for non-harmonised consumer products — the two regulations have different documentary structures. Ask the provider directly for a sample GPSR Article 9 file they have produced or supported.
We have an existing EU AR contract from 2023 under the old General Product Safety Directive. Does that contract automatically cover the new GPSR?
Probably not without an amendment. The General Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC was replaced by Regulation (EU) 2023/988 on 13 December 2024, and the scope and obligations of the Responsible Person under the new Regulation differ in detail from the equivalent figure under the old Directive. Most AR providers updated their contract templates in late 2024 or early 2025 to reflect the new obligations. Check with your provider to confirm that your existing contract has been updated and that it explicitly covers the Article 16 obligations under the new Regulation.
Our AR provider is asking us for a ‘technical file’ as part of the onboarding. Isn’t that what they’re supposed to provide?
No, and this is one of the most common misunderstandings at AR onboarding. The AR provider holds and forwards the technical file; the AR provider does not create it. At onboarding, the provider asks you for the file so they can register it in their system and be ready to hand it to authorities when asked. If you do not have the file yet, the AR onboarding cannot complete. GPSRCheck is the tool that produces the file you hand to the AR at onboarding. Produce the files first with GPSRCheck at €49 per SKU, then contract the AR and hand them the files as part of onboarding.
How do we handle AR designation for a new SKU added mid-contract (e.g. we add new styles in July for an AW26 programme)?
Most AR contracts allow adding new SKUs mid-contract either as part of the standard tier (if below the SKU limit) or with a pro-rated fee adjustment (if above). The administrative process is short — typically an email notification to the provider with the new SKU details and the new Article 9 file. GPSRCheck’s workflow is built for mid-season additions: the new file is generated in ten minutes, attached to the email to the AR, and registered on their system. The operational cadence matches the seasonal rhythm of Indian export manufacturing (SS and AW programmes with mid-season add-ons) without friction.
Is it legally safer to have a dedicated AR from a provider, or to rely on the European buyer being the importer of record?
Both arrangements are legal under the Regulation; they just allocate responsibility differently. When your European buyer is the importer of record and therefore the Responsible Person, the buyer carries the legal weight of authority correspondence, recalls and corrective actions. When you contract a dedicated AR, that AR carries the weight. The dedicated AR is preferred when the commercial structure is unstable (multiple small buyers, direct B2C sales, mixed channels where the importer of record varies). For stable B2B relationships with a single large European buyer, relying on the buyer-as-importer-of-record structure is the standard and operationally simplest approach, and it saves the €150–500 annual AR fee. Choose based on commercial stability of your export channels, not on legal safety — both are legal.

⚠️ Important notice: GPSRCheck generates the Article 9 technical file for non-harmonised consumer products only. Products under Union harmonisation legislation (Toy Safety Directive, Cosmetics Regulation, LVD, EMC, RED, MDR, Machinery Regulation, PPE Regulation) require different documentation. GPSRCheck does not provide the EU Responsible Person service under Article 16.

⚠️ Important notice: GPSRCheck is a self-assessment documentation tool, not legal advice and not a product testing service. The Article 9 technical file is generated from your input data. GPSRCheck does not provide the EU Responsible Person service.

The AR needs the file. GPSRCheck generates the file. €49 per SKU.

6 pages. 10 minutes. €49 per SKU. The Article 9 technical file your EU Authorised Representative needs to hold and forward when a market surveillance authority asks. Pair with any AR service you choose.

€49 per SKU
6-page PDF · 10 minutes · €49 per SKU · 100% in your browser · Permanent PDF, 30-day edit window
Generate the Technical File
✓ Last regulatory check: 27 April 2026 · No substantive changes detected · View history